Political observers may welcome the North Carolina House’s uncharacteristic speed in devising its 2003-05 budget plan by its previously announced deadline of Easter weekend, but state taxpayers are unlikely to view its nearly $860 million in extra taxes over the next two fiscal years as timely given the weakness of the state’s economic recovery. By working harder to identify budget savings, lawmakers could have avoided the tax increase without adversely affecting teachers, prisons, or other core services of state government.
-
Budget, Taxation, and the Economy
-
Education
- Apprenticeships
- Charter Schools
- Child Care
- Childhood Health and Nutrition
- Class Size
- Common Core State Standards
- Education and the Workforce
- Education Facilities
- Federal Education Policy
- Higher Education Funding
- North Carolina Education Lottery
- Prekindergarten Education
- Public School Finance
- School Choice
- Standards and Curricula
- Teaching Profession
- Testing and Accountability
- Virtual Schools
-
Government Regulation
- Alcohol Policy
- Asset Forfeiture
- Connectivity and Broadband
- Convention and Event Centers
- Criminal Law Reform
- Electricity and Energy
- Emerging Ideas and the Sharing Economy
- Eminent Domain
- Government Accountability
- Occupational Licensing
- Public Transit
- Publicly Funded Stadiums
- Red Tape and Regulatory Reform
- Transportation Planning
-
Health Care
-
North Carolina Info